Skip to main content

Delusion vs Faith

The other day I heard an interview with a psychologist discussing delusional thinking. His definition of delusion is believing in something without evidence. This struck me as two things: obvious and brilliant. Obvious, because it is the very definition. Brilliant, at least to me, because I had not considered that simple fact before. Now, to be clear, he did not define it as believing in something that is not true, just believing in something for which you have no evidence. The difference is illustrated by the example that during the middle ages, if you believed the world to be round, you would have been considered delusional. The reason is that nobody else believed it, and there was no evidence to support it.

So, what that simple statement did for me was start me to thinking about faith. Now, faith, like delusional thinking, is a belief in something without evidence, except that usually, there are many other people believing the same unsupported concept. Now, in some societies, the concept is believed by absolutely everyone, so to believe otherwise would be delusional. However, most people live in societies where a diversity of opinions is held.


Popular posts from this blog

St. Augustine on Curiosity ***

There is another form of temptation, even more fraught with danger. This is the disease of curiosity... It is this which drives us to try and discover the secrets of nature, those secrets which are beyond our understanding, which can avail us nothing and which man should not wish to learn.

- St. Augustine

***10/5/2013 - Note: this is probably a misquote, for the purpose of defaming St. Augustine.  I published it without any research as to its veracity, and I regret it.  He is a revered figure in Christianity and western culture, and whether we subscribe to his philosophy and views or not, everyone deserves at least to be described accurately. - James Carr.

Lieberman Agrees: Democrat Politicians are Paranoid Assholes

"But there is something profoundly wrong—something that should trouble all of us—when we have elected Democratic officials who seem more worried about how the Bush administration might respond to Iran’s murder of our troops, than about the fact that Iran is murdering our troops. "
- Senator Joe Lieberman, Nov 9, 2007

November 9, 2007
Contact: Marshall Wittmann

Lieberman Delivers Major Address on "The Politics of National Security"

WASHINGTON, D.C. – On Thursday, November 8, 2007, Senator Joe Lieberman (ID-CT) addressed a Center for Politics and Foreign Relations/Financial Times breakfast at The Johns Hopkins University Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies. The subject of Senator Lieberman’s talk was “The Politics of National Security,” in which he spoke about the future of the Democratic Party and its response to the threat of Iran.

In the address, Senator Lieberman stated, “Since retaking Congress in November 2006, the top foreig…